PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDD vs. SITEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDD vs. SITEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EDD having a 3.21% return and SITEX slightly higher at 3.35%. Over the past 10 years, EDD has outperformed SITEX with an annualized return of 5.02%, while SITEX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return.


EDD

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
3.21%
6M
2.25%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
5.02%

SITEX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.84%
YTD
3.35%
6M
3.97%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
11.69%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDD vs. SITEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
3.21%32.46%8.64%14.09%-14.15%-7.03%-2.84%25.45%-14.09%16.34%
SITEX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
3.35%19.86%2.65%13.56%-15.44%-5.84%4.04%14.37%-8.72%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EDD and SITEX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2007

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDD vs. SITEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDD
EDD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SITEX
SITEX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SITEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SITEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SITEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SITEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SITEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDD vs. SITEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDDSITEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.60

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

2.98

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

11.57

-7.98

EDD vs. SITEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the SITEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDD and SITEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDDSITEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.81

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.44

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.44

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.69

-0.58

Drawdowns

EDD vs. SITEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than SITEX's maximum drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and SITEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDDSITEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.38%

-45.23%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-5.56%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.67%

-8.06%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.04%

-28.38%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.70%

-28.92%

-13.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.17%

-0.83%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.23%

-6.61%

-17.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

1.40%

+3.89%

Volatility

EDD vs. SITEX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX) at 1.96%. This indicates that EDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SITEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDDSITEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

1.96%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

5.04%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

5.89%

+10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

7.11%

+8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

8.47%

+9.24%

EDD vs. SITEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDD has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SITEX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDD vs. SITEX - Dividend Comparison

EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than SITEX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
9.36%9.76%11.45%7.30%6.82%6.93%6.92%8.15%9.90%8.18%10.32%12.65%
SITEX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
6.29%6.27%5.68%5.16%1.62%3.43%0.38%2.18%2.47%3.90%1.58%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDD and SITEX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDD has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to SITEX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs SITEX's -45.23%.

SITEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDD and SITEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer