ED vs. SPMO
ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) is a stock, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, ED returned 6.98%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ED vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 6.98%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.95% annualized return.
ED
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
ED vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 5.89% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 22.54% | -6.62% | 19.30% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ED and SPMO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.09 |
The correlation between ED and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.10 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ED vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
ED
SPMO
ED vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ED | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.47 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.64 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 14.17 | -13.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ED | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 2.62 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.27 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 1.03 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 1.01 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
ED vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ED | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -30.95% | -47.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -12.70% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -20.13% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -22.74% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | -30.95% | +0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | 0.00% | -9.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -4.60% | -8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 3.26% | +1.17% |
Volatility
ED vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is 5.01%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that ED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ED | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 7.35% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 14.39% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 17.64% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 19.30% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 20.31% | +0.68% |
Dividends
ED vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.36% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ED and SPMO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to ED (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ED dropped -78.90% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ED and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer