ED vs. BYND
ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) and BYND (Beyond Meat, Inc.) are both stocks. ED operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while BYND operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, ED returned 10.68%/yr vs -65.98%/yr for BYND. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ED vs. BYND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than BYND's -16.91% return.
ED
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
BYND
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -15.29%
- YTD
- -16.91%
- 6M
- -37.50%
- 1Y
- -78.44%
- 3Y*
- -63.44%
- 5Y*
- -65.98%
- 10Y*
- —
ED vs. BYND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 10.24% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 8.90% |
BYND Beyond Meat, Inc. | -16.91% | -78.19% | -57.75% | -27.70% | -81.11% | -47.87% | 65.34% | 64.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ED and BYND is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019 | 0.02 |
The correlation between ED and BYND shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ED:
$39.26B
BYND:
$325.51M
ED:
$5.94
BYND:
$1.03
ED:
18.13
BYND:
0.66
ED:
2.27
BYND:
0.52
ED:
1.67
BYND:
4.35
ED:
$17.22B
BYND:
$275.50M
ED:
$11.62B
BYND:
$7.65M
ED:
$8.47B
BYND:
-$290.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ED vs. BYND — Risk / Return Rank
ED
BYND
ED vs. BYND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ED | BYND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.05 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.90 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | -1.19 | +2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ED vs. BYND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, smaller than the maximum BYND drawdown of -99.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and BYND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ED | BYND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -99.78% | +20.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -87.85% | +78.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -97.06% | +79.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -99.67% | +77.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -99.71% | +93.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -75.62% | +62.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 66.55% | -61.96% |
Volatility
ED vs. BYND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is 5.98%, while Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) has a volatility of 20.19%. This indicates that ED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ED | BYND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 20.19% | -14.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 75.70% | -63.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 236.92% | -220.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 126.82% | -108.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 117.26% | -96.25% |
Dividends
ED vs. BYND - Dividend Comparison
ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while BYND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYND Beyond Meat, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.23% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
Financials
ED vs. BYND - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Beyond Meat, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ED and BYND have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYND has higher volatility (20.19%) compared to ED (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ED dropped -78.90% vs BYND's -99.78%.
ED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ED and BYND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer