PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ED vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ED vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 7.01%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.


ED

1D
0.84%
1M
2.26%
YTD
10.24%
6M
12.27%
1Y
7.08%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
7.01%

BRK-B

1D
0.71%
1M
1.36%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
0.35%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ED vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
10.24%15.15%1.55%-1.12%15.65%22.96%-16.99%22.54%-6.62%19.30%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-2.67%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ED and BRK-B is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 1996

0.23

The correlation between ED and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ED:

$39.26B

BRK-B:

$1.06T

EPS

ED:

$5.94

BRK-B:

$33.62

PE Ratio

ED:

18.13

BRK-B:

14.55

PEG Ratio

ED:

1.29

BRK-B:

0.56

PS Ratio

ED:

2.27

BRK-B:

2.81

PB Ratio

ED:

1.67

BRK-B:

1.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

ED:

$17.22B

BRK-B:

$375.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ED:

$11.62B

BRK-B:

$94.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

ED:

$8.47B

BRK-B:

$71.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ED vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ED
ED Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ED Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ED Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ED Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ED Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ED vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.01

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

-0.02

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

-0.05

+1.64

ED vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ED Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ED and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ED vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.90%

-53.86%

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-9.42%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-14.95%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-26.58%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

-29.57%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-9.36%

+3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-11.07%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

4.53%

+0.06%

Volatility

ED vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.95%. This indicates that ED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

3.95%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

10.78%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

14.38%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

17.12%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

19.44%

+1.57%

Dividends

ED vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
3.23%3.42%3.72%3.56%3.32%3.63%4.23%3.27%3.74%3.25%3.64%4.05%

Financials

ED vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
5.10B
93.68B
(ED) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ED vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.5%
28.8%
Portfolio components
ED - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 5.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.5%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

ED - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

ED - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 924.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ED and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ED has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to BRK-B (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ED dropped -78.90% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

ED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ED and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer