ECSIX vs. BRW
ECSIX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund) and BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ECSIX returned 4.07%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for BRW. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECSIX charges 1.82%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for BRW.
Performance
ECSIX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECSIX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 3.83% return.
ECSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 9.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.96%
BRW
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
ECSIX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund | 1.76% | 10.19% | 5.71% | 7.31% | -3.31% | -0.02% |
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 3.83% | 5.89% | 12.16% | 18.49% | -4.64% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECSIX and BRW is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECSIX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank
ECSIX
BRW
ECSIX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECSIX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.07 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 0.23 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 0.42 | +12.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECSIX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21 | 0.31 | +2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.28 | 0.56 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 0.59 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
ECSIX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECSIX drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECSIX and BRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECSIX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -17.74% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -17.74% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.64% | -17.74% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.19% | -17.74% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -8.51% | +7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -3.93% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 9.86% | -9.18% |
Volatility
ECSIX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) is 1.12%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that ECSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECSIX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 2.28% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 7.54% | -5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83% | 13.20% | -10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 12.86% | -9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.18% | 12.86% | -9.68% |
ECSIX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECSIX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECSIX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison
ECSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than BRW's 14.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 14.89% | 14.46% | 12.27% | 16.02% | 13.82% | 4.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund | 6.33% | 5.07% | 6.21% | 6.18% | 4.78% | 3.54% | 3.47% | 3.53% | 3.19% | 2.96% | 3.20% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECSIX and BRW have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRW has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to ECSIX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECSIX dropped -12.95% vs BRW's -17.74%.
ECSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECSIX and BRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer