PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (ECRP.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ECRP.L is traded in GBp, while XZE5.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XZE5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


ECRP.L

1D
0.28%
1M
1.04%
YTD
-0.42%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*

XZE5.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ECRP.L
Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)
-0.42%8.36%-0.55%5.00%-8.32%-8.20%1.94%
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
-0.42%8.64%-0.59%3.12%-1.52%-6.82%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ECRP.L and XZE5.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.85

The correlation between ECRP.L and XZE5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECRP.L
ECRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ECRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ECRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XZE5.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (ECRP.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECRP.LXZE5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.05

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECRP.LXZE5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

Drawdowns

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECRP.LXZE5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECRP.LXZE5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.88%

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECRP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XZE5.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ECRP.L vs. XZE5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ECRP.L nor XZE5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ECRP.L and XZE5.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ECRP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECRP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZE5.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for ECRP.L and 0.16% for XZE5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECRP.L and XZE5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer