ECOW vs. VOO
ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECOW is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOW returned 7.26%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for VOO. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ECOW charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
ECOW vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOW achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return.
ECOW
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 29.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.35%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $617.95K | $706.50K | $1.39M | |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
ECOW vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.04% | 32.50% | 3.17% | 15.79% | -19.28% | 7.47% | -2.51% | 10.37% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOW and VOO is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.48 |
The correlation between ECOW and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ECOW vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECOW
VOO
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
ECOW
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
ECOW
VOO
Consumer Defensive
ECOW
VOO
Basic Materials
ECOW
VOO
Industrials
ECOW
VOO
Energy
ECOW
VOO
Utilities
ECOW
VOO
Technology
ECOW
VOO
Healthcare
ECOW
VOO
Financial Services
ECOW
-
VOO
Real Estate
ECOW
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOW vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
ECOW
VOO
ECOW vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECOW | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 2.21 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 9.44 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECOW vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOW drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOW and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOW | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -33.99% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -8.90% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -18.69% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -24.52% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -1.38% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.94% | -3.67% | -7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.08% | +1.08% |
Volatility
ECOW vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.51% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOW | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 3.54% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 10.10% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 12.82% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 16.93% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 18.01% | +2.03% |
ECOW vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOW has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOW vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.44% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOW and VOO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to ECOW (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECOW dropped -40.27% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 12.83% vs 7.26% for ECOW. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.
ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.
ECOW is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ECOW and 0.03% for VOO.
ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECOW and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer