ECOW vs. UUP
ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) and UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ECOW is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOW returned 6.59%/yr vs 5.89%/yr for UUP. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. ECOW charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UUP.
Performance
ECOW vs. UUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOW achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return.
ECOW
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- —
UUP
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
ECOW vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.62% | 32.50% | 3.17% | 15.79% | -19.28% | 7.47% | -2.51% | 10.37% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 5.44% | -4.99% | 13.50% | 3.63% | 9.46% | 5.73% | -6.66% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOW and UUP is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | -0.38 |
The correlation between ECOW and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.50 (1 year) to -0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOW vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank
ECOW
UUP
ECOW vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECOW | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 2.28 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.37 | 6.26 | +3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECOW vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOW drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOW and UUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOW | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -22.19% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -3.65% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -10.05% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -10.37% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -1.26% | -4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -8.88% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 1.33% | +1.69% |
Volatility
ECOW vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that ECOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOW | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 1.45% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 4.34% | +7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 6.03% | +8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 7.22% | +10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 6.90% | +13.20% |
ECOW vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOW has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOW vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison
ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than UUP's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.54% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 3.25% | 3.43% | 4.48% | 6.44% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.03% | 1.08% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOW and UUP have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECOW has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECOW dropped -40.27% vs UUP's -22.19%.
On 5-year performance, ECOW leads with 6.59% vs 5.89% for UUP. On fees, ECOW is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ECOW has performed better with a 6.59% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ECOW is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.
ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.25% for UUP.
ECOW is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UUP is Currency. ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ECOW and 0.75% for UUP.
ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECOW and UUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer