ECOW vs. EMOP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. ECOW is passively managed, while EMOP is actively managed. Over the past year, ECOW returned 30.63% vs 47.69% for EMOP. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.70% expense ratio.

Performance

ECOW vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECOW achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 27.21% return.

ECOW

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -3.09%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 8.43%
• 1Y: 30.63%
• 3Y*: 17.90%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: —

EMOP

• 1D: -4.78%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 27.21%
• 6M: 28.58%
• 1Y: 47.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECOW vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	8.95%	17.63%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	27.21%	16.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ECOW and EMOP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.75

The correlation between ECOW and EMOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

ECOW vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECOW	EMOP
Communication Services	15.1%	12.3%
Industrials	15.0%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	7.8%
Technology	10.3%	30.3%
Energy	9.8%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	1.4%
Basic Materials	8.4%	7.0%
Utilities	6.2%	2.8%
Healthcare	0.9%	1.6%
Financial Services	-	24.0%
Real Estate	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

ECOW vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECOW

ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 69
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 68

EMOP

EMOP Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECOW vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECOW	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.21	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.81	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.41	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	3.72	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.56	13.88	-2.32

ECOW vs. EMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the EMOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECOW and EMOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECOW vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECOW drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOW and EMOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECOW	EMOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.27%	-12.88%	-27.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.35%	-12.88%	+4.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.07%	-4.78%	-2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.02%	-2.00%	-9.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.44%	-0.78%

Volatility

ECOW vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) is 5.40%, while AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that ECOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECOW	EMOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	10.76%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.78%	19.59%	-7.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.78%	21.65%	-6.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.75%	21.57%	-3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.13%	21.57%	-1.44%

ECOW vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ECOW and EMOP have an expense ratio of 0.70%.

Dividends

ECOW vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than EMOP's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	4.61%	5.20%	7.35%	5.46%	7.50%	4.39%	3.35%	8.08%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.85%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECOW and EMOP in my portfolio?

ECOW and EMOP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECOW or EMOP?

EMOP has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to ECOW (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECOW dropped -40.27% vs EMOP's -12.88%.

Which ETF is better, ECOW or EMOP?

On 1-year performance, EMOP leads with 47.69% vs 30.63% for ECOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. On volatility, ECOW has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ECOW or EMOP?

Over the 1-year period, EMOP has performed better with a 47.69% return vs 30.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECOW or EMOP?

ECOW and EMOP have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECOW or EMOP?

ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.85% for EMOP.

What is the main difference between ECOW and EMOP?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and AllianceBernstein.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.