PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECON vs. TUR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECON vs. TUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 35.02% return, which is significantly higher than TUR's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ECON has outperformed TUR with an annualized return of 6.10%, while TUR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.


ECON

1D
-1.24%
1M
13.52%
YTD
35.02%
6M
38.26%
1Y
65.21%
3Y*
23.87%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
6.10%

TUR

1D
-2.34%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
13.80%
6M
16.84%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECON vs. TUR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECON
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF
35.02%34.15%0.22%7.51%-16.00%-14.11%20.83%17.22%-26.87%27.46%
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF
13.80%-1.54%12.91%-8.83%105.75%-27.41%-1.19%14.49%-41.46%37.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ECON and TUR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.47

The correlation between ECON and TUR shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (5 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECON vs. TUR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECON
TUR

Technology

30.4%
0.8%

Financial Services

24.5%
15.3%

Communication Services

10.2%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
5.0%

Basic Materials

7.1%
11.5%

Industrials

6.5%
25.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
13.7%

Energy

3.5%
6.2%

Healthcare

2.8%
2.0%

Utilities

1.4%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.2%

Technology

ECON
30.4%
TUR
0.8%

Financial Services

ECON
24.5%
TUR
15.3%

Communication Services

ECON
10.2%
TUR
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ECON
8.6%
TUR
5.0%

Basic Materials

ECON
7.1%
TUR
11.5%

Industrials

ECON
6.5%
TUR
25.7%

Consumer Defensive

ECON
3.5%
TUR
13.7%

Energy

ECON
3.5%
TUR
6.2%

Healthcare

ECON
2.8%
TUR
2.0%

Utilities

ECON
1.4%
TUR
1.7%

Real Estate

ECON
1.4%
TUR
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECON vs. TUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECON
ECON Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ECON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECON Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ECON Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECON Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TUR
TUR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECON vs. TUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECONTURDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.22

1.20

+2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.16

1.79

+2.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.24

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

1.89

+2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.83

5.67

+12.16

ECON vs. TUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECON Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is higher than the TUR Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECON and TUR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECONTURDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22

1.20

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.44

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.07

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.04

+0.20

Drawdowns

ECON vs. TUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, smaller than the maximum TUR drawdown of -72.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and TUR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECONTURDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.37%

-72.34%

+26.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-16.07%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-31.63%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.08%

-31.63%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.37%

-59.25%

+13.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-28.38%

+27.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.65%

-39.90%

+23.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

5.36%

-1.69%

Volatility

ECON vs. TUR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) is 9.10%, while iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) has a volatility of 14.14%. This indicates that ECON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECONTURDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

14.14%

-5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.65%

19.90%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.38%

25.40%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

34.16%

-13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

34.39%

-13.36%

ECON vs. TUR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TUR's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECON vs. TUR - Dividend Comparison

ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than TUR's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECON
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF
1.31%1.77%0.76%1.57%2.06%1.08%0.63%1.68%0.98%0.35%0.74%1.10%
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF
2.11%2.40%1.79%4.43%1.97%4.22%0.87%3.29%4.05%2.64%2.89%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECON and TUR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUR has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to ECON (9.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECON dropped -45.37% vs TUR's -72.34%.

On 10-year performance, ECON leads with 6.10% vs 2.47% for TUR. On fees, ECON is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ECON has been the lower-risk option at 9.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ECON has performed better with a 6.10% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ECON is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TUR.

TUR has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.31% for ECON.

ECON tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while TUR tracks MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECON and 0.59% for TUR.

ECON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECON and TUR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer