ECON vs. PRXV
ECON (Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECON is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while PRXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Praxis. ECON is passively managed, while PRXV is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECON charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.
Performance
ECON vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ECON
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 35.02%
- 6M
- 38.26%
- 1Y
- 65.21%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
PRXV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECON vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF | 15.23% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECON and PRXV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECON vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank
ECON
PRXV
ECON vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECON | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECON | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 4.54 | -4.30 |
Drawdowns
ECON vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and PRXV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECON | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.37% | -1.18% | -44.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -0.03% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | -0.32% | -16.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | — | — |
Volatility
ECON vs. PRXV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECON | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.38% | 9.66% | +10.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 9.66% | +10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 9.66% | +11.37% |
ECON vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECON vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison
ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF | 1.31% | 1.77% | 0.76% | 1.57% | 2.06% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 1.68% | 0.98% | 0.35% | 0.74% | 1.10% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECON and PRXV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECON.
ECON has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.
ECON is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PRXV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECON and 0.36% for PRXV.
Find the right allocation for ECON and PRXV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer