ECON vs. EMXC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ECON (Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - ECON tracks the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index while EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECON returned 6.29%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for EMXC. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

ECON vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 30.94% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 38.31% return.

ECON

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.41%
• YTD: 30.94%
• 6M: 31.40%
• 1Y: 53.17%
• 3Y*: 22.11%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 6.31%

EMXC

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 5.15%
• YTD: 38.31%
• 6M: 39.71%
• 1Y: 64.42%
• 3Y*: 27.78%
• 5Y*: 12.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECON vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	30.94%	34.15%	0.22%	7.51%	-16.00%	-14.11%	20.83%	17.22%	-26.87%	3.34%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	38.31%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ECON and EMXC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017	0.77

The correlation between ECON and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECON vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECON	EMXC
Technology	44.0%	52.4%
Financial Services	20.5%	17.4%
Industrials	6.7%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	4.1%
Basic Materials	5.5%	6.0%
Communication Services	5.3%	3.0%
Energy	3.5%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	2.4%
Healthcare	2.6%	1.8%
Utilities	1.8%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.8%

Return for Risk

ECON vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECON

ECON Risk / Return Rank: 80
ECON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ECON Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ECON Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ECON Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ECON Martin Ratio Rank: 80

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 86
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECON vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECON	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.57	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	3.10	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.48	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	4.49	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.83	17.10	-3.27

ECON vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECON Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECON and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECON vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and EMXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECON	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.37%	-42.81%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.76%	-14.41%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.37%	-19.12%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.08%	-28.91%	-9.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.76%	-6.16%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-10.15%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	3.78%	+0.08%

Volatility

ECON vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) is 13.50%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that ECON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECON	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.50%	14.74%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.32%	23.43%	-2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.50%	25.26%	-1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.95%	18.40%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.22%	20.24%	+0.98%

ECON vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ECON and EMXC have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

ECON vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than EMXC's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	1.35%	1.77%	0.76%	1.57%	2.06%	1.08%	0.63%	1.68%	0.98%	0.35%	0.74%	1.10%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	1.93%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECON and EMXC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ECON and EMXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ECON or EMXC?

EMXC has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to ECON (13.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECON dropped -45.37% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, ECON or EMXC?

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.45% vs 6.29% for ECON. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, ECON has been the lower-risk option at 13.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ECON or EMXC?

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECON or EMXC?

ECON and EMXC have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECON or EMXC?

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.35% for ECON.

What is the main difference between ECON and EMXC?

ECON tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.