PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECO vs. NOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECO vs. NOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 73.56% return, which is significantly higher than NOG's -10.36% return.


ECO

1D
5.19%
1M
10.41%
6M
54.36%
YTD
73.56%
1Y
156.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NOG

1D
-1.44%
1M
-7.12%
6M
-12.00%
YTD
-10.36%
1Y
-35.02%
3Y*
-14.51%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
-7.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECO vs. NOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
73.56%71.94%-11.70%-1.25%
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
-10.36%-38.20%4.84%5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ECO and NOG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ECO:

$1.80B

NOG:

$2.01B

EPS

ECO:

$5.73

NOG:

-$6.34

PS Ratio

ECO:

3.96

NOG:

1.20

PB Ratio

ECO:

2.89

NOG:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECO:

$481.57M

NOG:

$1.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECO:

$274.61M

NOG:

$450.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

ECO:

$284.05M

NOG:

$73.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECO vs. NOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECO
ECO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NOG
NOG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECO vs. NOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECONOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.89

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.25

-0.85

+10.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.78

-1.62

+27.39

ECO vs. NOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the NOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECO and NOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECO vs. NOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum NOG drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and NOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECONOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.15%

-98.96%

+52.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.66%

-41.43%

+23.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-92.85%

+89.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-69.82%

+54.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

21.78%

-15.45%

Volatility

ECO vs. NOG - Volatility Comparison

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) at 14.14%. This indicates that ECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECONOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.55%

14.14%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.07%

32.39%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.32%

45.38%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.27%

49.25%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.27%

70.57%

-28.30%

Dividends

ECO vs. NOG - Dividend Comparison

ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, less than NOG's 9.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
9.10%6.26%15.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
9.72%8.38%4.41%4.02%2.86%0.75%

Financials

ECO vs. NOG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
170.17M
5.03M
(ECO) Total Revenue
(NOG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ECO and NOG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECO has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to NOG (14.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs NOG's -98.96%.

ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECO and NOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer