PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IEXA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECMA.DE achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than IEXA.DE's 1.30% return.


ECMA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.33%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*

IEXA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.48%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ECMA.DE
Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc
1.12%2.90%4.30%7.06%-0.85%
IEXA.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc
1.30%2.47%3.54%7.38%-0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ECMA.DE and IEXA.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022

0.90

The correlation between ECMA.DE and IEXA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECMA.DE
ECMA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IEXA.DE
IEXA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IEXA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEXA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEXA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IEXA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEXA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IEXA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECMA.DEIEXA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.87

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

2.79

-0.17

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the IEXA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECMA.DE and IEXA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECMA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, roughly equal to the maximum IEXA.DE drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECMA.DE and IEXA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECMA.DEIEXA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-9.06%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-2.56%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.68%

-2.56%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-2.24%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.80%

+0.01%

Volatility

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IEXA.DE) have volatilities of 0.78% and 0.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECMA.DEIEXA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.78%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

2.77%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

3.26%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

4.77%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.16%

4.77%

-0.61%

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECMA.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IEXA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ECMA.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ECMA.DE nor IEXA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ECMA.DE and IEXA.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ECMA.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECMA.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IEXA.DE.

ECMA.DE tracks Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor, while IEXA.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate ex-Financials Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ECMA.DE and 0.20% for IEXA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECMA.DE and IEXA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer