ECLN vs. PBW
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW).
ECLN and PBW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECLN is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 19, 2019. PBW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). It was launched on Mar 3, 2005.
Performance
ECLN vs. PBW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ECLN vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 13.60% | 16.78% | 22.60% | -3.36% | 5.28% | 12.26% | 8.98% | 5.66% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 3.51% | 53.96% | -30.77% | -20.03% | -44.55% | -29.86% | 204.82% | 16.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECLN achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than PBW's 3.51% return.
ECLN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- —
PBW
- 1D
- 4.99%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 102.59%
- 3Y*
- -6.15%
- 5Y*
- -18.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECLN vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ECLN vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank
ECLN
PBW
ECLN vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECLN | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 2.41 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 2.91 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.66 | -1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 12.87 | -0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECLN | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.41 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | -0.44 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | -0.07 | +0.77 |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLN and PBW is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ECLN vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison
ECLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than PBW's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.80% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 0.86% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
ECLN vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECLN drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLN and PBW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLN | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -89.02% | +56.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -21.24% | +12.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.88% | -84.98% | +65.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -73.91% | +73.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -62.86% | +57.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 7.70% | -5.70% |
Volatility
ECLN vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) is 2.87%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 12.60%. This indicates that ECLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ECLN | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 12.60% | -9.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.36% | 31.89% | -24.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 42.85% | -30.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 42.94% | -28.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 38.49% | -20.97% |