ECLN vs. GLIX
ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) and GLIX (Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECLN charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GLIX.
Performance
ECLN vs. GLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ECLN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLIX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 10.46%
- YTD
- 13.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECLN vs. GLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 12.96% | -0.73% |
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 13.31% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLN and GLIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECLN vs. GLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECLN vs. GLIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLN | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.54% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.96% | — |
Volatility
ECLN vs. GLIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECLN | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.94% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 11.94% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 11.94% | — |
ECLN vs. GLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECLN vs. GLIX - Dividend Comparison
ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 2.01% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECLN and GLIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLIX is cheaper at 0.96% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLIX is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.
GLIX has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.43% for ECLN.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ECLN and 0.96% for GLIX.
Find the right allocation for ECLN and GLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer