ECLN vs. GLIX
ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) and GLIX (Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECLN charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GLIX.
Performance
ECLN vs. GLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECLN achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than GLIX's 9.30% return.
ECLN
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
GLIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECLN vs. GLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 12.15% | -1.35% |
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 9.30% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLN and GLIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECLN vs. GLIX — Risk / Return Rank
ECLN
GLIX
ECLN vs. GLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECLN | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECLN | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.29 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
ECLN vs. GLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECLN drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, which is greater than GLIX's maximum drawdown of -7.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLN and GLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLN | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -7.82% | -24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -3.80% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -2.06% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | — | — |
Volatility
ECLN vs. GLIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECLN | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 11.94% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 11.94% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 11.94% | +5.47% |
ECLN vs. GLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECLN vs. GLIX - Dividend Comparison
ECLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than GLIX's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.83% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 1.66% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECLN and GLIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLIX is cheaper at 0.96% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLIX is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.
ECLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.66% for GLIX.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ECLN and 0.96% for GLIX.
Find the right allocation for ECLN and GLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer