ECH vs. KEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX).
ECH and KEMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2007. KEMX is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019. Both ECH and KEMX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ECH vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ECH vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | -1.58% | 65.41% | -8.67% | 9.01% | 25.12% | -19.80% | -7.13% | -23.77% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 9.35% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 9.35% return.
ECH
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- 36.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
KEMX
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 50.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECH vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ECH vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
ECH
KEMX
ECH vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECH | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.36 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 3.00 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 3.25 | -1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 13.60 | -7.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECH | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.36 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.52 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.50 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between ECH and KEMX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ECH vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than KEMX's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 2.05% | 2.01% | 3.12% | 4.77% | 6.73% | 5.49% | 2.16% | 2.47% | 2.37% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 2.13% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 3.00% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ECH vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and KEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECH | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.08% | -38.80% | -35.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.65% | -15.36% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.17% | -30.85% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.87% | -11.68% | -15.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.65% | -9.02% | -28.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.19% | 3.67% | +2.52% |
Volatility
ECH vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) is 10.98%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that ECH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ECH | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.98% | 12.58% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.99% | 16.96% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.34% | 21.39% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.84% | 17.55% | +10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 20.61% | +6.44% |