ECH vs. FID
ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ECH tracks the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECH returned 10.98%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECH charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
ECH vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 8.56% return.
ECH
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
ECH vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | -1.19% | 65.41% | -8.67% | 9.01% | 25.12% | -19.80% | -7.13% | -17.79% | -7.31% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECH and FID is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between ECH and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
ECH vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECH
FID
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
ECH
FID
Basic Materials
ECH
FID
Industrials
ECH
FID
Utilities
ECH
FID
Consumer Cyclical
ECH
FID
Real Estate
ECH
FID
Consumer Defensive
ECH
FID
Communication Services
ECH
FID
Energy
ECH
-
FID
Healthcare
ECH
-
FID
Technology
ECH
-
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECH vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
ECH
FID
ECH vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECH | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.62 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 9.14 | -5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECH | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.30 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.39 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
ECH vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECH | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.08% | -39.79% | -34.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.65% | -8.93% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.59% | -10.97% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | -29.13% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.58% | -1.11% | -25.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.52% | -8.47% | -29.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.76% | 2.55% | +5.21% |
Volatility
ECH vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that ECH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECH | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 3.00% | +4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.29% | 8.12% | +12.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.85% | 10.16% | +14.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.51% | 17.04% | +10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.21% | 18.96% | +8.25% |
ECH vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECH vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 2.04% | 2.01% | 3.12% | 4.77% | 6.73% | 5.49% | 2.16% | 2.47% | 2.37% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 2.13% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECH and FID have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECH has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECH dropped -74.08% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, ECH leads with 10.98% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, ECH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ECH has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ECH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.04% for ECH.
ECH tracks MSCI Chile Investable Market Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECH and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECH and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer