ECH vs. BKIE
ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ECH tracks the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECH returned 11.03%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for BKIE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECH charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
ECH vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 9.30% return.
ECH
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 28.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.09%
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- —
ECH vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | -0.99% | 65.41% | -8.67% | 9.01% | 25.12% | -19.80% | 34.75% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 9.30% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECH and BKIE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ECH and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
ECH vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECH
BKIE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
ECH
BKIE
Basic Materials
ECH
BKIE
Industrials
ECH
BKIE
Utilities
ECH
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
ECH
BKIE
Real Estate
ECH
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
ECH
BKIE
Communication Services
ECH
BKIE
Energy
ECH
-
BKIE
Healthcare
ECH
-
BKIE
Technology
ECH
-
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECH vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
ECH
BKIE
ECH vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECH | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 2.03 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 7.83 | -4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECH | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.59 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.57 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.92 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
ECH vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECH | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.08% | -28.19% | -45.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.65% | -11.41% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.59% | -13.19% | -12.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | -28.19% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.43% | -0.56% | -25.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.52% | -4.98% | -32.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.82% | 2.95% | +4.87% |
Volatility
ECH vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.31%. This indicates that ECH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECH | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 4.31% | +3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 12.19% | +8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.85% | 14.58% | +10.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.50% | 16.12% | +11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 16.33% | +10.87% |
ECH vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECH vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than BKIE's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 2.03% | 2.01% | 3.12% | 4.77% | 6.73% | 5.49% | 2.16% | 2.47% | 2.37% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECH and BKIE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECH has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to BKIE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECH dropped -74.08% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, ECH leads with 11.03% vs 9.22% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ECH has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECH.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.03% for ECH.
ECH tracks MSCI Chile Investable Market Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECH and 0.04% for BKIE.
BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECH and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer