PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECH vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECH vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than AMZY's 1.40% return.


ECH

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.75%
YTD
2.23%
6M
5.27%
1Y
36.61%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
4.44%

AMZY

1D
1.83%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
1.40%
6M
2.54%
1Y
8.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECH vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
2.23%65.41%-8.67%-8.96%
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
1.40%10.39%35.28%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ECH and AMZY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECH vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECH
ECH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ECH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECH Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ECH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECH vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECHAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.08

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

0.44

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

1.05

+3.35

ECH vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECH Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECH and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECH vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than AMZY's maximum drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECHAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.08%

-23.70%

-50.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.74%

-19.61%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.03%

-9.46%

-14.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.48%

-5.38%

-32.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.33%

8.13%

+0.20%

Volatility

ECH vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) at 7.69%. This indicates that ECH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECHAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

7.69%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.20%

16.77%

+4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.51%

23.97%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.63%

25.07%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.27%

25.07%

+2.20%

ECH vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECH vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than AMZY's 56.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
56.44%52.59%47.91%9.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
1.93%2.01%3.12%4.77%6.73%5.49%2.16%2.47%2.37%1.42%1.85%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECH and AMZY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECH has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to AMZY (7.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECH dropped -74.08% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 1-year performance, ECH leads with 36.61% vs 8.54% for AMZY. On fees, ECH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AMZY has been the lower-risk option at 7.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ECH has performed better with a 36.61% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ECH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 56.44%, compared with 1.93% for ECH.

ECH is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AMZY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECH and 1.09% for AMZY.

ECH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECH and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer