PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECFHX vs. DSU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECFHX vs. DSU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (ECFHX) and BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECFHX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than DSU's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ECFHX has underperformed DSU with an annualized return of 3.58%, while DSU has yielded a comparatively higher 8.03% annualized return.


ECFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.60%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.58%

DSU

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.04%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECFHX vs. DSU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECFHX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
0.47%3.54%6.21%9.73%-4.11%3.71%1.79%7.01%-0.77%3.60%
DSU
BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc.
0.34%5.97%11.13%30.34%-15.51%19.36%1.60%23.84%-10.04%10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ECFHX and DSU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2000

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECFHX vs. DSU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECFHX
ECFHX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ECFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ECFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DSU
DSU Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSU Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECFHX vs. DSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (ECFHX) and BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECFHXDSUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

0.51

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

0.83

+1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.10

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

0.58

+0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.10

2.15

+2.95

ECFHX vs. DSU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECFHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the DSU Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECFHX and DSU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECFHXDSUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

0.51

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

0.59

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.51

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.23

+0.84

Drawdowns

ECFHX vs. DSU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECFHX drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum DSU drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECFHX and DSU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECFHXDSUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-72.03%

+37.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.86%

-7.21%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.98%

-14.59%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.24%

-24.23%

+16.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.47%

-45.36%

+25.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.12%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-11.60%

+9.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

1.93%

-1.38%

Volatility

ECFHX vs. DSU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (ECFHX) is 0.51%, while BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that ECFHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECFHXDSUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

1.40%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.55%

6.19%

-4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

8.12%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.74%

11.74%

-9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

15.91%

-12.29%

ECFHX vs. DSU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECFHX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is lower than DSU's 2.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECFHX vs. DSU - Dividend Comparison

ECFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, less than DSU's 12.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSU
BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc.
12.19%11.64%11.01%9.70%7.56%6.21%7.96%7.43%8.41%6.98%6.60%8.07%
ECFHX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
5.95%6.36%6.38%5.62%4.02%2.48%2.92%4.08%3.64%3.09%3.39%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECFHX and DSU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSU has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to ECFHX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECFHX dropped -34.41% vs DSU's -72.03%.

ECFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECFHX and DSU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer