PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EC.PA vs. RHM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in TotalEnergies EP Gabon S.A (EC.PA) and Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EC.PA achieves a 29.22% return, which is significantly higher than RHM.DE's -22.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EC.PA has underperformed RHM.DE with an annualized return of 26.42%, while RHM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 37.62% annualized return.


EC.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
4.78%
YTD
29.22%
6M
27.85%
1Y
32.31%
3Y*
39.57%
5Y*
41.96%
10Y*
26.42%

RHM.DE

1D
-0.85%
1M
-16.25%
YTD
-22.99%
6M
-21.94%
1Y
-34.42%
3Y*
72.88%
5Y*
70.83%
10Y*
37.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EC.PA
TotalEnergies EP Gabon S.A
29.22%54.82%46.30%11.60%80.23%7.23%47.73%14.77%-10.99%-4.75%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
-22.99%155.27%116.51%56.82%128.13%-1.77%-8.85%35.55%-26.03%68.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EC.PA and RHM.DE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 1994

0.11

The correlation between EC.PA and RHM.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EC.PA
EC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RHM.DE
RHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TotalEnergies EP Gabon S.A (EC.PA) and Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EC.PARHM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.89

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

-0.80

+3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

-1.81

+8.37

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EC.PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EC.PA and RHM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EC.PARHM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

-0.76

+2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

1.67

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.99

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.44

+0.04

Drawdowns

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EC.PA drawdown since its inception was -76.79%, roughly equal to the maximum RHM.DE drawdown of -76.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EC.PA and RHM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EC.PARHM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.79%

-76.51%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-43.11%

+32.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.34%

-43.11%

+22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.34%

-43.11%

+22.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.68%

-62.18%

+16.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-39.55%

+39.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.31%

-23.08%

-4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

18.88%

-14.01%

Volatility

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TotalEnergies EP Gabon S.A (EC.PA) is 4.60%, while Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) has a volatility of 16.69%. This indicates that EC.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RHM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EC.PARHM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

16.69%

-12.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

33.84%

-12.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.72%

45.11%

-19.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.52%

41.92%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.34%

37.85%

-8.51%

Dividends

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE - Dividend Comparison

EC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.07%, more than RHM.DE's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EC.PA
TotalEnergies EP Gabon S.A
16.07%47.32%10.17%13.25%45.90%2.67%36.05%7.36%3.73%2.78%2.56%7.15%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
0.97%0.52%0.93%1.50%1.77%2.41%5.54%2.05%2.20%1.37%1.72%0.49%

Financials

EC.PA vs. RHM.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TotalEnergies EP Gabon S.A and Rheinmetall AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EC.PA and RHM.DE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EC.PA and RHM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer