EBND vs. FEMB
EBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF) and FEMB (First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. EBND is passively managed, while FEMB is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EBND returned 1.72%/yr vs 2.51%/yr for FEMB. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBND charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FEMB.
Performance
EBND vs. FEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than FEMB's 0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, EBND has underperformed FEMB with an annualized return of 1.72%, while FEMB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.51% annualized return.
EBND
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
FEMB
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 10.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
EBND vs. FEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | -0.23% | 15.83% | -2.70% | 9.02% | -11.84% | -9.66% | 4.49% | 10.40% | -6.52% | 13.93% |
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 0.60% | 21.77% | -5.61% | 17.12% | -10.50% | -13.40% | 3.16% | 11.52% | -7.19% | 11.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBND and FEMB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2014 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EBND and FEMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBND vs. FEMB — Risk / Return Rank
EBND
FEMB
EBND vs. FEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBND | FEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.35 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 4.34 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBND | FEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.22 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.16 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.23 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.09 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
EBND vs. FEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FEMB drawdown of -30.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and FEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBND | FEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.51% | -30.44% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -7.58% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | -10.13% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -27.85% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.50% | -30.44% | +0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -3.91% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -9.93% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.35% | -0.37% |
Volatility
EBND vs. FEMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) is 2.35%, while First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that EBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBND | FEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 3.05% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 6.57% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.92% | 8.36% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.98% | 10.26% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.19% | 10.99% | -1.80% |
EBND vs. FEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBND vs. FEMB - Dividend Comparison
EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than FEMB's 6.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 5.83% | 5.54% | 5.89% | 5.26% | 4.75% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 4.70% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.06% | 5.67% | 6.09% | 5.15% | 6.35% | 6.12% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 5.86% | 6.38% | 5.83% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBND and FEMB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEMB has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to EBND (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBND dropped -29.51% vs FEMB's -30.44%.
On 10-year performance, FEMB leads with 2.51% vs 1.72% for EBND. On fees, EBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EBND has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FEMB has performed better with a 2.51% return vs 1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FEMB.
FEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 5.83% for EBND.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EBND and 0.85% for FEMB.
FEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBND and FEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer