EBND vs. EMBD
EBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF) and EMBD (Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. EBND is passively managed, while EMBD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBND returned 0.03%/yr vs 2.87%/yr for EMBD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBND charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMBD.
Performance
EBND vs. EMBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than EMBD's 1.27% return.
EBND
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
EMBD
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 10.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
EBND vs. EMBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | -0.23% | 15.83% | -2.70% | 9.02% | -11.84% | -9.66% | 7.38% |
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.27% | 12.55% | 6.76% | 10.60% | -13.84% | -1.84% | 11.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBND and EMBD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between EBND and EMBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBND vs. EMBD — Risk / Return Rank
EBND
EMBD
EBND vs. EMBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBND | EMBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.32 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 2.45 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 9.52 | -6.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBND | EMBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.73 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.31 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.46 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
EBND vs. EMBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.51%, which is greater than EMBD's maximum drawdown of -24.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and EMBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBND | EMBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.51% | -24.27% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -4.23% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | -7.03% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -24.27% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -0.50% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -5.88% | -4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.09% | +0.89% |
Volatility
EBND vs. EMBD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) at 1.62%. This indicates that EBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBND | EMBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 1.62% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 4.16% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.92% | 6.00% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.98% | 9.17% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.19% | 8.89% | +0.30% |
EBND vs. EMBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBND vs. EMBD - Dividend Comparison
EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than EMBD's 5.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 5.83% | 5.54% | 5.89% | 5.26% | 4.75% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 4.70% | 2.00% |
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.69% | 5.48% | 5.83% | 5.29% | 4.53% | 4.99% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBND and EMBD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EBND has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to EMBD (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBND dropped -29.51% vs EMBD's -24.27%.
On 5-year performance, EMBD leads with 2.87% vs 0.03% for EBND. On fees, EBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EMBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMBD has performed better with a 2.87% return vs 0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMBD.
EBND has the higher dividend yield at 5.83%, compared with 5.69% for EMBD.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EBND and 0.39% for EMBD.
EMBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBND and EMBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer