EBND vs. BNDW
EBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF) and BNDW (Vanguard Total World Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBND is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified, while BNDW is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBND returned 0.03%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for BNDW. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBND charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDW.
Performance
EBND vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 0.42% return.
EBND
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
BNDW
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- —
EBND vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | -0.23% | 15.83% | -2.70% | 9.02% | -11.84% | -9.66% | 4.49% | 10.40% | 5.21% |
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 0.42% | 5.02% | 2.42% | 7.18% | -12.88% | -2.10% | 6.22% | 8.37% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBND and BNDW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018 | 0.40 |
The correlation between EBND and BNDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBND vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank
EBND
BNDW
EBND vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBND | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.31 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 3.70 | -0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBND | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.05 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.37 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
EBND vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.51%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and BNDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBND | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.51% | -17.22% | -12.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -2.70% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | -4.27% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -16.93% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -1.53% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -4.98% | -5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 0.95% | +1.03% |
Volatility
EBND vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 1.31%. This indicates that EBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBND | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 1.31% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 2.62% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.92% | 3.36% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.98% | 5.21% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.19% | 4.90% | +4.29% |
EBND vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBND vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison
EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than BNDW's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.12% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% | 0.00% |
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 5.83% | 5.54% | 5.89% | 5.26% | 4.75% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 4.70% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBND and BNDW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EBND has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to BNDW (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBND dropped -29.51% vs BNDW's -17.22%.
On 5-year performance, BNDW leads with 0.22% vs 0.03% for EBND. On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BNDW has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BNDW has performed better with a 0.22% return vs 0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EBND.
EBND has the higher dividend yield at 5.83%, compared with 4.21% for BNDW.
EBND is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while BNDW is Global Bonds. EBND tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified, while BNDW tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EBND and 0.05% for BNDW.
BNDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBND and BNDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer