EBNAX vs. EDD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EBNAX (American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund) and EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, EBNAX returned 2.31%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for EDD. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBNAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EDD.

Performance

EBNAX vs. EDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EBNAX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBNAX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than EDD's 3.21% return.

EBNAX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 11.22%
• 3Y*: 9.08%
• 5Y*: 2.31%
• 10Y*: —

EDD

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: 3.21%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 19.08%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 5.85%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBNAX vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EBNAX American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund	2.26%	15.91%	0.33%	12.11%	-14.03%	-3.96%	7.65%	13.16%	-4.67%	13.57%
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	3.21%	32.46%	8.64%	14.09%	-14.15%	-7.03%	-2.84%	25.45%	-14.09%	16.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EBNAX and EDD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2016	0.51

The correlation between EBNAX and EDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EBNAX vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBNAX

EBNAX Risk / Return Rank: 57
EBNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EBNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EBNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EBNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EBNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

EDD

EDD Risk / Return Rank: 15
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 18
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBNAX vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EBNAX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBNAX	EDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.19	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	1.69	+1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.22	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	1.08	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.84	3.64	+5.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBNAX vs. EDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the EDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBNAX and EDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBNAX	EDD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	1.19	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.38	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.11	+0.41

Drawdowns

EBNAX vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBNAX drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, smaller than the maximum EDD drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBNAX and EDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBNAX	EDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.27%	-59.38%	+33.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.93%	-17.67%	+12.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.98%	-17.67%	+10.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.72%	-32.04%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-9.17%	+8.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-24.23%	+18.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	5.26%	-3.99%

Volatility

EBNAX vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EBNAX) is 1.78%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that EBNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBNAX	EDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.78%	4.70%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.04%	13.02%	-8.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.88%	16.12%	-11.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.74%	15.32%	-8.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.92%	17.72%	-10.80%

EBNAX vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBNAX vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison

EBNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than EDD's 9.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBNAX American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund	5.93%	6.12%	7.26%	5.45%	5.39%	4.85%	4.89%	6.09%	5.90%	6.59%	1.85%	0.00%
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	9.36%	9.76%	11.45%	7.30%	6.82%	6.93%	6.92%	8.15%	9.90%	8.18%	10.32%	12.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBNAX and EDD in my portfolio?

EBNAX and EDD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBNAX or EDD?

EDD has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to EBNAX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBNAX dropped -26.27% vs EDD's -59.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.