PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD
-21.88%-11.88%69.67%
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
9.57%18.66%-4.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIT.TO achieves a -21.88% return, which is significantly lower than UTES.TO's 9.57% return.


EBIT.TO

1D
1.85%
1M
5.14%
YTD
-21.88%
6M
-41.28%
1Y
-21.84%
3Y*
32.34%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*

UTES.TO

1D
-2.03%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
9.57%
6M
8.75%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIT.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIT.TO
EBIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBIT.TOUTES.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

1.94

-2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.45

2.54

-3.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.36

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

2.59

-3.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.96

10.83

-11.79

EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIT.TO and UTES.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBIT.TOUTES.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

1.94

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

1.36

-1.29

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT.TO and UTES.TO is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO - Dividend Comparison

EBIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%.


TTM20252024
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD
0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
15.76%18.30%6.05%

Drawdowns

EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than UTES.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT.TO and UTES.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EBIT.TOUTES.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.45%

-10.19%

-65.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.63%

-8.29%

-42.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.63%

-2.33%

-44.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-2.64%

-30.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.74%

2.01%

+21.73%

Volatility

EBIT.TO vs. UTES.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.82% compared to Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) at 3.44%. This indicates that EBIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EBIT.TOUTES.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.82%

3.44%

+9.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.35%

6.98%

+29.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.68%

11.00%

+33.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.10%

11.12%

+43.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.37%

11.12%

+44.25%