PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EBIT-U.TO is traded in USD, while FBTC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FBTC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EBIT-U.TO having a -26.81% return and FBTC.TO slightly higher at -26.14%.


EBIT-U.TO

1D
1.65%
1M
-2.19%
6M
-33.71%
YTD
-26.81%
1Y
-45.49%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*

FBTC.TO

1D
1.13%
1M
-3.05%
6M
-33.61%
YTD
-26.14%
1Y
-44.49%
3Y*
28.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EBIT-U.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD
-26.81%-6.74%115.98%153.86%-64.96%-19.20%
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-26.14%-6.59%118.65%151.79%-63.64%-20.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT-U.TO and FBTC.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2021

0.90

The correlation between EBIT-U.TO and FBTC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIT-U.TO
EBIT-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EBIT-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EBIT-U.TOFBTC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.83

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.83

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

-1.34

-0.03

EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIT-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is comparable to the FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIT-U.TO and FBTC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.55%, which is greater than FBTC.TO's maximum drawdown of -71.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT-U.TO and FBTC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBIT-U.TOFBTC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.55%

-71.97%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.37%

-53.52%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.37%

-53.52%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.57%

-48.58%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-32.22%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.35%

33.27%

+0.08%

Volatility

EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.32% compared to Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) at 10.73%. This indicates that EBIT-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBIT-U.TOFBTC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.32%

10.73%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.75%

33.91%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.29%

43.99%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.49%

52.43%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.01%

52.43%

+3.58%

Dividends

EBIT-U.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBIT-U.TO nor FBTC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EBIT-U.TO and FBTC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBIT-U.TO and FBTC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer