PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBI vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBI vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBI achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.


EBI

1D
0.57%
1M
1.34%
6M
12.29%
YTD
16.15%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.71%
6M
17.92%
YTD
18.52%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBI vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EBI
Longview Advantage ETF
16.15%15.82%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
18.52%-9.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EBI and RSBY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBI vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBI
EBI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBI vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EBIRSBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

2.15

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.71

5.04

+10.67

EBI vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBI and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EBI vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBI drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBI and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBIRSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-23.32%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-7.95%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.45%

+6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-13.35%

+11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

3.39%

-1.64%

Volatility

EBI vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.15%. This indicates that EBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBIRSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.15%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

8.37%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

11.41%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

13.37%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

13.37%

+4.23%

EBI vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBI vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

EBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than RSBY's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EBI
Longview Advantage ETF
1.11%1.05%0.00%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
1.75%2.07%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBI and RSBY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EBI has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to RSBY (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBI dropped -17.05% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 27.99% vs 17.35% for RSBY. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 27.99% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.11% for EBI.

EBI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Longview and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EBI and 0.98% for RSBY.

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBI and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer