EATZ vs. USFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. EATZ is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EATZ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.

Performance

EATZ vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USFR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: 4.74%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EATZ vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	1.82%	4.23%	5.47%	5.18%	1.98%	-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and USFR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.01

The correlation between EATZ and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EATZ vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

USFR

USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATZ vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EATZ	USFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	14.67	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	50.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	13.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	201.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	779.76	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EATZ	USFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-1.36%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.15%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EATZ	USFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.27%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	0.40%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	0.78%	—

EATZ vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EATZ vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than USFR's 3.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	3.90%	4.15%	5.17%	5.12%	1.78%	0.01%	0.40%	2.08%	1.67%	1.03%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EATZ and USFR in my portfolio?

EATZ and USFR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EATZ or USFR?

On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EATZ or USFR?

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EATZ or USFR?

USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between EATZ and USFR?

EATZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for EATZ and 0.15% for USFR.