PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EATZ vs. HDGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EATZ vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EATZ

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDGE

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.12%
YTD
6.12%
6M
6.85%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
-4.06%
5Y*
-1.94%
10Y*
-15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EATZ vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
4.80%-6.67%23.21%25.23%-20.68%-4.90%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
6.12%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%-0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and HDGE is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

-0.67

The correlation between EATZ and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from -0.67 (5 years) to -0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EATZ vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EATZ
HDGE

Consumer Cyclical

78.2%
-18.1%

Consumer Defensive

16.9%
-3.0%

Industrials

4.9%
-13.9%

Communication Services

2.3%
-6.1%

Basic Materials

-

-1.3%

Energy

-

-2.5%

Financial Services

-

-25.3%

Healthcare

-

-1.2%

Real Estate

-

-8.6%

Technology

-

-19.5%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

EATZ
78.2%
HDGE
-18.1%

Consumer Defensive

EATZ
16.9%
HDGE
-3.0%

Industrials

EATZ
4.9%
HDGE
-13.9%

Communication Services

EATZ
2.3%
HDGE
-6.1%

Basic Materials

EATZ

-

HDGE
-1.3%

Energy

EATZ

-

HDGE
-2.5%

Financial Services

EATZ

-

HDGE
-25.3%

Healthcare

EATZ

-

HDGE
-1.2%

Real Estate

EATZ

-

HDGE
-8.6%

Technology

EATZ

-

HDGE
-19.5%

Utilities

EATZ

-

HDGE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EATZ vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATZ vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EATZHDGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

EATZ vs. HDGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EATZ vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EATZHDGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

Volatility

EATZ vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EATZHDGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.50%

EATZ vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

EATZ vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than HDGE's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
0.48%0.50%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%0.00%0.00%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.29%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


EATZ and HDGE have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EATZ is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EATZ is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

EATZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while HDGE is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for EATZ and 3.36% for HDGE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EATZ and HDGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer