EATZ vs. HDGE
Compare and contrast key facts about AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE).
EATZ and HDGE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EATZ is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Apr 20, 2021. HDGE is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011.
Performance
EATZ vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EATZ vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | -0.73% | -6.67% | 23.21% | 25.23% | -20.68% | -5.06% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 12.05% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | 0.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EATZ achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 12.05% return.
EATZ
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -7.59%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -5.70%
- 1Y
- -4.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 4.28%
- 3Y*
- -4.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.67%
- 10Y*
- -14.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EATZ vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EATZ vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
EATZ
HDGE
EATZ vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EATZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | 0.22 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | 0.45 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.06 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.21 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 0.30 | -0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EATZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 0.22 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.66 | +0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between EATZ and HDGE is -0.68. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EATZ vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than HDGE's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.12% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
EATZ vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EATZ drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATZ and HDGE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EATZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.40% | -93.88% | +59.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -19.63% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.11% | -92.64% | +74.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.38% | -69.85% | +56.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.13% | 13.53% | -1.40% |
Volatility
EATZ vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 4.48%. This indicates that EATZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EATZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.48% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 12.17% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 19.95% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 23.96% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 23.51% | -1.86% |