EATVX vs. HFCVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX).
EATVX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 27, 1999. HFCVX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Nov 1, 1996.
Performance
EATVX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EATVX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATVX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund | 1.24% | 12.86% | 14.37% | 9.44% | -9.77% | 25.92% | 4.39% | 29.73% | -5.98% | 17.65% |
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 9.21% | 18.27% | 9.59% | 5.81% | 6.12% | 29.94% | -6.39% | 20.84% | -9.50% | 19.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EATVX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, EATVX has underperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 10.32%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.
EATVX
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
HFCVX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EATVX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EATVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EATVX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank
EATVX
HFCVX
EATVX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EATVX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.44 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.95 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.72 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 7.47 | -1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EATVX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.44 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.93 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.66 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.40 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between EATVX and HFCVX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EATVX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison
EATVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than HFCVX's 6.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATVX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund | 4.11% | 4.16% | 3.75% | 3.24% | 2.17% | 4.50% | 1.29% | 1.13% | 1.57% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 8.71% |
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 6.77% | 7.39% | 4.56% | 3.57% | 10.33% | 4.81% | 2.58% | 6.58% | 17.16% | 14.97% | 2.26% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
EATVX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EATVX drawdown since its inception was -53.01%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATVX and HFCVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EATVX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.01% | -65.75% | +12.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -11.00% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.70% | -16.81% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.63% | -39.39% | +0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -1.46% | -4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -8.28% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.61% | +0.28% |
Volatility
EATVX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 3.06%. This indicates that EATVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EATVX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 3.06% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 6.83% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 12.75% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 13.28% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 16.48% | +1.04% |