EART vs. PICK
EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EART is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while PICK is a Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EART returned 19.97%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for PICK. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EART charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.
Performance
EART vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 17.36% return.
EART
- 1D
- -5.19%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 90.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PICK
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 69.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.67%
EART vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 8.19% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -17.92% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 17.36% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between EART and PICK is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between EART and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EART vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
EART
PICK
EART vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EART | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 3.56 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 13.38 | -3.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EART vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EART | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -68.87% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -19.54% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.20% | -32.52% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -12.59% | -5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.98% | -24.06% | -4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 5.20% | +3.78% |
Volatility
EART vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) have volatilities of 13.28% and 13.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EART | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.28% | 13.12% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 26.56% | +6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.51% | 30.14% | +9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 28.14% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 28.34% | +5.92% |
EART vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EART vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than PICK's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.21% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EART and PICK have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EART has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to PICK (13.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EART dropped -53.68% vs PICK's -68.87%.
On 3-year performance, EART leads with 19.97% vs 18.27% for PICK. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PICK has been the lower-risk option at 13.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 19.97% return vs 18.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EART.
PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.60% for EART.
EART is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while PICK is Metals. EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EART and 0.39% for PICK.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EART and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer