PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EART.L vs. IGLS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EART.L vs. IGLS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) and iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EART.L achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly lower than IGLS.L's 0.18% return.


EART.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.27%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
0.80%
3Y*
1.07%
5Y*
10Y*

IGLS.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.64%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
0.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EART.L vs. IGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EART.L
Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-1.29%2.88%-4.87%6.69%-26.52%-3.52%
IGLS.L
iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
0.18%5.26%2.65%4.19%-4.45%-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EART.L and IGLS.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.63

The correlation between EART.L and IGLS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EART.L vs. IGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EART.L
EART.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EART.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EART.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLS.L
IGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EART.L vs. IGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) and iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EART.LIGLS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.31

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

1.58

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

5.42

-5.13

EART.L vs. IGLS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EART.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the IGLS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EART.L and IGLS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EART.LIGLS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

1.55

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

0.68

-1.24

Drawdowns

EART.L vs. IGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EART.L drawdown since its inception was -35.57%, which is greater than IGLS.L's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART.L and IGLS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EART.LIGLS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.57%

-9.54%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.90%

-1.95%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.43%

-1.95%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.22%

-0.73%

-28.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-1.10%

-24.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

0.57%

+2.13%

Volatility

EART.L vs. IGLS.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L) at 0.82%. This indicates that EART.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EART.LIGLS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

0.82%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.57%

1.75%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

1.99%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.21%

2.67%

+8.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.21%

2.18%

+9.03%

EART.L vs. IGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EART.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLS.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EART.L vs. IGLS.L - Dividend Comparison

EART.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EART.L
Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLS.L
iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
3.99%3.88%3.67%1.62%0.30%0.25%0.53%0.46%0.33%0.53%0.88%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


EART.L and IGLS.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EART.L.

EART.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while IGLS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EART.L and 0.07% for IGLS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EART.L and IGLS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer