EAPCX vs. FFGTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EAPCX (Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A) and FFGTX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, EAPCX returned 10.84%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for FFGTX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAPCX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for FFGTX.

Performance

EAPCX vs. FFGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAPCX achieves a 22.29% return, which is significantly lower than FFGTX's 24.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EAPCX has underperformed FFGTX with an annualized return of 10.84%, while FFGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.

EAPCX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 22.29%
• 6M: 24.53%
• 1Y: 41.38%
• 3Y*: 18.36%
• 5Y*: 14.60%
• 10Y*: 10.84%

FFGTX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 24.39%
• 6M: 26.75%
• 1Y: 51.49%
• 3Y*: 19.48%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: 12.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAPCX vs. FFGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	22.29%	22.06%	9.63%	-4.87%	17.26%	29.92%	7.77%	9.19%	-9.60%	6.71%
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M	24.39%	27.96%	2.37%	-5.62%	20.06%	25.38%	5.41%	17.23%	-13.73%	17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EAPCX and FFGTX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012	0.60

The correlation between EAPCX and FFGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EAPCX vs. FFGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAPCX

EAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 89
EAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FFGTX

FFGTX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FFGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FFGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FFGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FFGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FFGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAPCX vs. FFGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAPCX	FFGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	3.15	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	3.98	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.53	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.85	6.94	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.87	24.97	-4.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAPCX vs. FFGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAPCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is comparable to the FFGTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAPCX and FFGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAPCX	FFGTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06	3.15	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.62	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.56	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.33	-0.02

Drawdowns

EAPCX vs. FFGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAPCX drawdown since its inception was -52.59%, smaller than the maximum FFGTX drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAPCX and FFGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAPCX	FFGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.59%	-58.53%	+5.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-7.42%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.57%	-19.63%	+9.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.05%	-27.31%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.81%	-48.88%	+20.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.96%	-1.58%	-2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.77%	-20.37%	-2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	2.06%	-0.04%

Volatility

EAPCX vs. FFGTX - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAPCX	FFGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	4.33%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	13.28%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.90%	16.36%	-2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	21.39%	-6.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.26%	22.44%	-9.18%

EAPCX vs. FFGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAPCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGTX's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAPCX vs. FFGTX - Dividend Comparison

EAPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than FFGTX's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	10.82%	13.23%	5.46%	3.43%	14.80%	13.74%	3.01%	1.11%	0.41%	4.98%	6.49%	0.00%
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M	1.62%	2.02%	1.93%	1.47%	1.47%	2.91%	1.03%	2.51%	1.57%	0.36%	1.05%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAPCX and FFGTX in my portfolio?

EAPCX and FFGTX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAPCX or FFGTX?

FFGTX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to EAPCX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAPCX dropped -52.59% vs FFGTX's -58.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.