EAPCX vs. FFGCX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EAPCX (Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A) and FFGCX (Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, EAPCX returned 10.60%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for FFGCX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EAPCX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FFGCX.

Performance

EAPCX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EAPCX having a 19.69% return and FFGCX slightly higher at 19.72%. Over the past 10 years, EAPCX has underperformed FFGCX with an annualized return of 10.60%, while FFGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.29% annualized return.

EAPCX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 5.38%
• 6M: 14.79%
• YTD: 19.69%
• 1Y: 36.68%
• 3Y*: 14.77%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: 10.60%
• ALL TIME*: 3.72%

FFGCX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 6.23%
• 6M: 7.03%
• YTD: 19.72%
• 1Y: 41.78%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 12.29%
• ALL TIME*: 7.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EAPCX vs. FFGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	19.69%	22.06%	9.63%	-4.87%	17.26%	29.92%	7.77%	9.19%	-9.60%	6.71%
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	19.72%	28.66%	2.98%	-5.18%	20.69%	26.08%	6.04%	17.82%	-13.21%	17.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EAPCX and FFGCX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.60

The correlation between EAPCX and FFGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EAPCX vs. FFGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EAPCX

EAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 85
EAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
EAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
EAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FFGCX

FFGCX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FFGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FFGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FFGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FFGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FFGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EAPCX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAPCX	FFGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.40	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.04	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.41	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	3.33	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.52	11.15	-1.63

EAPCX vs. FFGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAPCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FFGCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAPCX and FFGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAPCX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAPCX drawdown since its inception was -52.59%, smaller than the maximum FFGCX drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAPCX and FFGCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAPCX	FFGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.59%	-57.23%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-12.27%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.23%	-19.24%	+7.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.05%	-27.22%	+9.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.81%	-48.43%	+19.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.00%	-5.47%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.60%	-19.25%	-3.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	3.66%	+0.12%

Volatility

EAPCX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) is 3.55%, while Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that EAPCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAPCX	FFGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	4.49%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.26%	13.87%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.36%	17.11%	-2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	21.26%	-6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.27%	22.34%	-9.07%

EAPCX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAPCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGCX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAPCX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison

EAPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, more than FFGCX's 2.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	11.05%	13.23%	5.46%	3.43%	14.80%	13.74%	3.01%	1.11%	0.41%	4.98%	6.49%	0.00%
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	2.11%	2.53%	2.62%	2.01%	1.84%	3.39%	1.61%	2.98%	2.22%	0.36%	1.53%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAPCX and FFGCX in my portfolio?

EAPCX and FFGCX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAPCX or FFGCX?

FFGCX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to EAPCX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAPCX dropped -52.59% vs FFGCX's -57.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.