PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOR vs. NFXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOR vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.21% return.


EAOR

1D
-1.13%
1M
0.30%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.03%
1Y
17.34%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*

NFXS

1D
0.09%
1M
21.28%
YTD
24.21%
6M
24.00%
1Y
64.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
6.45%15.59%-1.45%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
24.21%-8.56%-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and NFXS is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

-0.28

The correlation between EAOR and NFXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (all time) to -0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOR vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NFXS
NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAORNFXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.06

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

5.64

+5.64

EAOR vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and NFXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAORNFXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-50.37%

+27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-31.31%

+24.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-12.88%

+11.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-31.93%

+26.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

11.45%

-9.91%

Volatility

EAOR vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) is 3.74%, while Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that EAOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAORNFXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

7.74%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

26.22%

-18.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.11%

33.81%

-24.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.62%

34.65%

-24.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.44%

34.65%

-24.21%

EAOR vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAOR vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than NFXS's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.36%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
3.23%3.53%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAOR and NFXS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFXS has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to EAOR (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs 17.34% for EAOR. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs 17.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.36% for EAOR.

EAOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 1.03% for NFXS.

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOR and NFXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer