EAOR vs. MFUL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL).

EAOR and MFUL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EAOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. MFUL is an actively managed fund by Mohr Funds. It was launched on Nov 2, 2021.

Performance

EAOR vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EAOR vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	-1.51%	15.59%	10.69%	14.96%	-16.66%	-0.21%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	-0.53%	4.51%	5.36%	2.24%	-12.46%	-1.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than MFUL's -0.53% return.

EAOR

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: 0.75%
• 1Y: 13.98%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: 5.30%
• 10Y*: —

MFUL

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -0.53%
• 6M: -0.41%
• 1Y: 3.24%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

MFUL

Mindful Conservative ETF

EAOR

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

EAOR vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR

EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 73
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 76

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 35
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOR	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	0.69	+0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	0.94	+0.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.14	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	0.94	+0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.06	3.33	+4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAOR vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and MFUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOR	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	0.69	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	-0.20	+0.94

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and MFUL is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EAOR vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than MFUL's 3.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	2.48%	2.45%	2.52%	2.39%	1.99%	1.39%	1.07%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.13%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOR	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.91%	-16.41%	-6.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-3.77%	-4.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.80%	-4.13%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-9.80%	+4.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.06%	+0.69%

Volatility

EAOR vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.89%. This indicates that EAOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAOR	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.28%	1.89%	+2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.59%	3.10%	+3.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.09%	4.75%	+6.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.46%	4.22%	+6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.41%	4.22%	+6.19%