EAOR vs. MDAA
EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOR is passively managed, while MDAA is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EAOR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
EAOR vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 18.45% return.
EAOR
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.01%
MDAA
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $101.16K | $92.75K | $68.31K | |
| $2.21K | $4.58K | $40.10K |
EAOR vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 8.99% | 1.70% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 18.45% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOR and MDAA is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOR vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
EAOR
MDAA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EAOR vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAOR | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAOR vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOR | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -14.59% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.09% | +4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -3.53% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | — | — |
Volatility
EAOR vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOR | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.38% | 24.57% | -15.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 24.57% | -13.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.42% | 24.57% | -14.15% |
EAOR vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOR vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than MDAA's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.34% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EAOR and MDAA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.
EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.39% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for EAOR and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer