EAOR vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAOR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOR returned 6.41%/yr vs 6.11%/yr for IWM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EAOR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

EAOR vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return.

EAOR

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 6M: 7.84%
• 1Y: 19.56%
• 3Y*: 13.83%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	7.50%	15.59%	10.69%	14.96%	-16.66%	10.51%	15.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	39.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and IWM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020	0.82

The correlation between EAOR and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOR vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAOR	IWM
Technology	22.3%	19.5%
Financial Services	10.3%	15.8%
Industrials	6.8%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	7.8%
Communication Services	5.6%	2.0%
Healthcare	5.2%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	2.1%
Energy	2.3%	6.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.5%
Utilities	1.7%	3.0%
Real Estate	1.2%	5.7%

Return for Risk

EAOR vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR

EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 69
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOR	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.05	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.85	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.34	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	3.56	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	12.64	+0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAOR vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOR	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.05	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.27	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.37	+0.51

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOR	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.91%	-59.05%	+36.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.62%	-11.03%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.28%	-27.50%	+17.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	-31.91%	+9.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-1.49%	+0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-10.77%	+5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	3.10%	-1.60%

Volatility

EAOR vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) is 2.79%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that EAOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAOR	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	5.75%	-2.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.90%	13.53%	-6.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.55%	19.20%	-10.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.52%	22.52%	-12.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.39%	23.04%	-12.65%

EAOR vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EAOR vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	2.34%	2.45%	2.52%	2.39%	1.99%	1.39%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAOR and IWM in my portfolio?

EAOR and IWM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAOR or IWM?

IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to EAOR (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, EAOR or IWM?

On 5-year performance, EAOR leads with 6.41% vs 6.11% for IWM. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAOR or IWM?

Over the 5-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 6.41% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAOR or IWM?

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAOR or IWM?

EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

What is the main difference between EAOR and IWM?

EAOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.