EAOR vs. IBIT

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAOR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EAOR returned 16.61% vs -44.36% for IBIT. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EAOR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

EAOR vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.86% return.

EAOR

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 6.08%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 1Y: 16.61%
• 3Y*: 12.83%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.46%
• 6M: -33.60%
• YTD: -25.86%
• 1Y: -44.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	7.67%	15.59%	11.48%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-25.86%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and IBIT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.40

Return for Risk

EAOR vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR

EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 70
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 73

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAOR	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	-1.00	+2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	-1.48	+4.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.84	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	-0.83	+3.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	-1.35	+12.05

EAOR vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOR	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.91%	-53.30%	+30.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.62%	-53.30%	+46.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-48.37%	+47.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-17.66%	+12.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	33.00%	-31.44%

Volatility

EAOR vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) is 2.68%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that EAOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAOR	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	11.83%	-9.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.68%	35.00%	-27.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.11%	44.46%	-35.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.63%	49.95%	-39.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.41%	49.95%	-39.54%

EAOR vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EAOR vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	2.36%	2.45%	2.52%	2.39%	1.99%	1.39%	1.07%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAOR and IBIT in my portfolio?

EAOR and IBIT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAOR or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to EAOR (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

Which ETF is better, EAOR or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, EAOR leads with 16.61% vs -44.36% for IBIT. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAOR or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 16.61% return vs -44.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAOR or IBIT?

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAOR or IBIT?

EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between EAOR and IBIT?

EAOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.