PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOR vs. EAOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOR vs. EAOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than EAOK's 3.85% return.


EAOR

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.41%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.84%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*

EAOK

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.83%
YTD
3.85%
6M
3.87%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. EAOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
7.50%15.59%10.69%14.96%-16.66%10.51%15.00%
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.85%11.47%5.81%10.13%-14.92%4.32%8.01%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and EAOK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.91

The correlation between EAOR and EAOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOR vs. EAOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOR
EAOK

Technology

22.3%
10.2%

Financial Services

10.3%
4.8%

Industrials

6.8%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
2.7%

Communication Services

5.6%
2.6%

Healthcare

5.2%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
1.3%

Energy

2.3%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.8%

Utilities

1.7%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.6%

Technology

EAOR
22.3%
EAOK
10.2%

Financial Services

EAOR
10.3%
EAOK
4.8%

Industrials

EAOR
6.8%
EAOK
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOR
5.8%
EAOK
2.7%

Communication Services

EAOR
5.6%
EAOK
2.6%

Healthcare

EAOR
5.2%
EAOK
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

EAOR
2.8%
EAOK
1.3%

Energy

EAOR
2.3%
EAOK
1.1%

Basic Materials

EAOR
1.8%
EAOK
0.8%

Utilities

EAOR
1.7%
EAOK
0.8%

Real Estate

EAOR
1.2%
EAOK
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOR vs. EAOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOK
EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. EAOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOREAOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.78

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

12.14

+0.90

EAOR vs. EAOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the EAOK Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and EAOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOREAOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.24

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.46

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.65

+0.22

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. EAOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than EAOK's maximum drawdown of -19.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and EAOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOREAOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-19.91%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-4.43%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.28%

-7.08%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-19.91%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.39%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-5.02%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.01%

+0.49%

Volatility

EAOR vs. EAOK - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) at 2.05%. This indicates that EAOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOREAOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.05%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

4.48%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.55%

5.49%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.52%

7.04%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.39%

6.83%

+3.56%

EAOR vs. EAOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EAOR and EAOK have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOR vs. EAOK - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than EAOK's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.17%3.18%3.15%2.80%2.27%1.19%1.00%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.34%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EAOR and EAOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAOR has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to EAOK (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs EAOK's -19.91%.

On 5-year performance, EAOR leads with 6.41% vs 3.20% for EAOK. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 2.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 6.41% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOR and EAOK have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.34% for EAOR.

EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index.

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOR and EAOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer