PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOM vs. SPBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EAOM vs. SPBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EAOM vs. SPBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
-0.98%12.90%7.29%11.83%-15.48%3.20%
SPBC
Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF
-6.79%16.83%37.32%48.04%-28.00%14.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly higher than SPBC's -6.79% return.


EAOM

1D
1.38%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
0.86%
1Y
10.87%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*

SPBC

1D
3.13%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-6.79%
6M
-6.85%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
23.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAOM vs. SPBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPBC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EAOM vs. SPBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPBC
SPBC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SPBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. SPBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOMSPBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

0.77

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.24

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.20

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.22

4.37

+3.84

EAOM vs. SPBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the SPBC Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOM and SPBC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOMSPBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.77

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.65

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and SPBC is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EAOM vs. SPBC - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than SPBC's 0.96% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.92%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%
SPBC
Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF
0.96%0.85%0.98%3.79%0.60%1.41%0.00%

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. SPBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum SPBC drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and SPBC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOMSPBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-33.99%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-13.16%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.67%

-9.50%

+5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-8.89%

+3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

3.62%

-2.28%

Volatility

EAOM vs. SPBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 3.32%, while Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EAOMSPBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

6.14%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.81%

11.68%

-6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

20.28%

-12.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.02%

20.59%

-12.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.91%

20.59%

-12.68%