EAOK vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAOK is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EAOK returned 10.85% vs -39.82% for IBIT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EAOK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

EAOK vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOK achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.88% return.

EAOK

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 3.44%
• 6M: 3.32%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 8.55%
• 5Y*: 3.04%
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -17.81%
• YTD: -28.88%
• 6M: -28.88%
• 1Y: -39.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOK vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF	3.44%	11.47%	6.59%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-28.88%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOK and IBIT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

EAOK vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOK

EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 61
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 63

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOK vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAOK	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	-0.90	+2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	-1.25	+3.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.86	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	-0.77	+3.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.57	-1.30	+11.87

EAOK vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOK Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOK and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAOK vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOK	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.91%	-52.11%	+32.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.43%	-52.11%	+47.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-50.47%	+49.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-16.85%	+11.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	30.58%	-29.55%

Volatility

EAOK vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is 2.31%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that EAOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAOK	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.31%	13.18%	-10.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.86%	34.64%	-29.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.80%	44.31%	-38.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.10%	50.22%	-43.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.85%	50.22%	-43.37%

EAOK vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EAOK vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF	3.18%	3.18%	3.15%	2.80%	2.27%	1.19%	1.00%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAOK and IBIT in my portfolio?

EAOK and IBIT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAOK or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to EAOK (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOK dropped -19.91% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

Which ETF is better, EAOK or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, EAOK leads with 10.85% vs -39.82% for IBIT. On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAOK or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, EAOK has performed better with a 10.85% return vs -39.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAOK or IBIT?

EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAOK or IBIT?

EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between EAOK and IBIT?

EAOK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOK and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.