EALT vs. OCTQ
EALT (Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. EALT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OCTQ.
Performance
EALT vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EALT
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 10.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EALT vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | -0.34% |
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
EALT vs. OCTQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EALT
OCTQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
EALT
OCTQ
Financial Services
EALT
OCTQ
Communication Services
EALT
OCTQ
Consumer Cyclical
EALT
OCTQ
Healthcare
EALT
OCTQ
Industrials
EALT
OCTQ
Consumer Defensive
EALT
OCTQ
Energy
EALT
OCTQ
Utilities
EALT
OCTQ
Real Estate
EALT
OCTQ
Basic Materials
EALT
OCTQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EALT vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank
EALT
OCTQ
EALT vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EALT | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EALT | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EALT vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and OCTQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EALT | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | 0.00% | -14.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | 0.00% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | 0.00% | -1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | — | — |
Volatility
EALT vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EALT | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.45% | 0.00% | +7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.07% | 0.00% | +10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.07% | 0.00% | +10.07% |
EALT vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EALT vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither EALT nor OCTQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.
EALT and OCTQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EALT and 0.79% for OCTQ.
Find the right allocation for EALT and OCTQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer