PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EALT vs. JULJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EALT vs. JULJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EALT vs. JULJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
-4.36%9.45%18.02%6.80%
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
0.80%5.91%6.17%2.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly lower than JULJ's 0.80% return.


EALT

1D
0.48%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
-4.36%
6M
-2.54%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JULJ

1D
0.07%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.80%
6M
2.19%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EALT vs. JULJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than JULJ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EALT vs. JULJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALT
EALT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EALT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EALT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

JULJ
JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALT vs. JULJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EALTJULJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.27

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

2.11

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.48

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.55

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.38

15.70

-10.32

EALT vs. JULJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the JULJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and JULJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EALTJULJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.27

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.91

-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between EALT and JULJ is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EALT vs. JULJ - Dividend Comparison

EALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JULJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%.


Drawdowns

EALT vs. JULJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than JULJ's maximum drawdown of -3.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and JULJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EALTJULJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-3.62%

-11.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-3.62%

-4.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

0.00%

-6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-0.11%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.36%

+1.46%

Volatility

EALT vs. JULJ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) at 0.68%. This indicates that EALT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EALTJULJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

0.68%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

1.27%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

4.40%

+7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

3.16%

+7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

3.16%

+7.20%