EALT vs. APRH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EALT (Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and APRH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EALT returned 10.95% vs 7.82% for APRH. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EALT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRH.

Performance

EALT vs. APRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than APRH's 4.49% return.

EALT

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 10.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRH

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 4.49%
• 6M: 4.02%
• 1Y: 7.82%
• 3Y*: 7.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALT vs. APRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	1.05%	9.45%	18.02%	6.80%
APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April	4.49%	5.84%	6.91%	2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EALT and APRH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.60

The correlation between EALT and APRH shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EALT vs. APRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EALT	APRH
Technology	33.6%	33.6%
Financial Services	12.2%	12.4%
Communication Services	10.5%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	9.5%	9.5%
Industrials	8.5%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	5.3%
Energy	4.0%	4.0%
Utilities	2.6%	2.5%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

EALT vs. APRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALT

EALT Risk / Return Rank: 40
EALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EALT Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EALT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

APRH

APRH Risk / Return Rank: 93
APRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
APRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
APRH Omega Ratio Rank: 97
APRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
APRH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALT vs. APRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EALT	APRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	3.18	-1.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	4.75	-2.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.90	-0.62
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	6.48	-4.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	22.02	-15.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EALT vs. APRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the APRH Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and APRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EALT	APRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	3.18	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	1.70	-0.37

Drawdowns

EALT vs. APRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than APRH's maximum drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and APRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EALT	APRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-5.87%	-8.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-1.21%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.08%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-0.21%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	0.36%	+1.40%

Volatility

EALT vs. APRH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) is 0.46%, while Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) has a volatility of 0.55%. This indicates that EALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EALT	APRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	0.55%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.51%	1.98%	+3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.45%	2.47%	+4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.07%	4.56%	+5.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.07%	4.56%	+5.51%

EALT vs. APRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than APRH's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EALT vs. APRH - Dividend Comparison

EALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April	5.35%	5.49%	6.87%	5.90%
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EALT and APRH in my portfolio?

EALT and APRH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EALT or APRH?

APRH has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to EALT (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALT dropped -14.76% vs APRH's -5.87%.

Which ETF is better, EALT or APRH?

On 1-year performance, EALT leads with 10.95% vs 7.82% for APRH. On fees, EALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EALT or APRH?

Over the 1-year period, EALT has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EALT or APRH?

EALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EALT or APRH?

APRH has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 0.00% for EALT.

What is the main difference between EALT and APRH?

Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EALT and 0.79% for APRH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.