EAGG vs. SUSB
EAGG (iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF) and SUSB (iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAGG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index, while SUSB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAGG returned 0.01%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for SUSB. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAGG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SUSB.
Performance
EAGG vs. SUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAGG achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than SUSB's 0.57% return.
EAGG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
SUSB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
EAGG vs. SUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.26% | 7.18% | 1.12% | 5.58% | -13.63% | -1.30% | 7.40% | 8.68% | 2.35% |
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 0.57% | 6.81% | 4.83% | 5.98% | -5.72% | -0.76% | 4.96% | 7.02% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAGG and SUSB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between EAGG and SUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAGG vs. SUSB — Risk / Return Rank
EAGG
SUSB
EAGG vs. SUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAGG | SUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.45 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 3.05 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 12.47 | -6.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAGG | SUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.34 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.75 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.72 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
EAGG vs. SUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAGG drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than SUSB's maximum drawdown of -13.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAGG and SUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAGG | SUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -13.25% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -1.49% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.20% | -1.49% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.98% | -9.57% | -8.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | -0.35% | -2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -1.58% | -4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.36% | +0.53% |
Volatility
EAGG vs. SUSB - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) at 0.64%. This indicates that EAGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAGG | SUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 0.64% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 1.41% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 1.93% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 2.96% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.50% | 3.72% | +1.78% |
EAGG vs. SUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAGG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSB's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EAGG vs. SUSB - Dividend Comparison
EAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than SUSB's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.01% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.24% | 2.07% | 1.09% | 1.82% | 3.17% | 0.61% | 0.00% |
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.40% | 3.81% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.83% | 2.61% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAGG and SUSB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAGG has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to SUSB (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAGG dropped -18.74% vs SUSB's -13.25%.
On 5-year performance, SUSB leads with 2.20% vs 0.01% for EAGG. On fees, EAGG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SUSB has performed better with a 2.20% return vs 0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAGG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SUSB.
SUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.01% for EAGG.
EAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SUSB is Corporate Bonds. EAGG tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index, while SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EAGG and 0.12% for SUSB.
SUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAGG and SUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer