PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAGG vs. SCHZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAGG vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAGG achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's 0.43% return.


EAGG

1D
0.08%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.39%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*

SCHZ

1D
0.13%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.46%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAGG vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EAGG
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF
0.34%7.18%1.12%5.58%-13.63%-1.30%7.40%8.68%2.35%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.43%7.24%1.26%5.60%-13.17%-1.72%7.46%8.65%2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EAGG and SCHZ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.96

The correlation between EAGG and SCHZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAGG vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAGG
EAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHZ
SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAGG vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAGGSCHZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.77

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

5.38

-0.23

EAGG vs. SCHZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the SCHZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAGG and SCHZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAGGSCHZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.02

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.44

-0.06

Drawdowns

EAGG vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAGG drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAGG and SCHZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAGGSCHZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-18.74%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.70%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-6.18%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-18.01%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-2.34%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-3.68%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.88%

+0.01%

Volatility

EAGG vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAGGSCHZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.24%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.67%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

3.79%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

6.08%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

5.41%

+0.09%

EAGG vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAGG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAGG vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison

EAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than SCHZ's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAGG
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF
4.00%3.92%3.93%3.24%2.07%1.09%1.82%3.17%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.11%4.05%3.96%3.28%2.63%2.16%2.43%2.79%2.56%2.40%2.24%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, EAGG and SCHZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAGG has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to SCHZ (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAGG dropped -18.74% vs SCHZ's -18.74%.

On 5-year performance, SCHZ leads with 0.09% vs 0.03% for EAGG. On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHZ has performed better with a 0.09% return vs 0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for EAGG.

SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 4.00% for EAGG.

EAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SCHZ is Total Bond Market. EAGG tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index, while SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EAGG and 0.03% for SCHZ.

SCHZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAGG and SCHZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer