EAGG vs. IBTM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM).
EAGG and IBTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EAGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2018. IBTM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Jul 6, 2022. Both EAGG and IBTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EAGG vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EAGG vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.01% | 7.18% | 1.12% | 5.58% | -3.24% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | -0.01% | 8.06% | -0.14% | 3.48% | -4.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAGG achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.01% return.
EAGG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAGG vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAGG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EAGG vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank
EAGG
IBTM
EAGG vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAGG | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.88 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.57 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 4.42 | +0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAGG | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.88 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.22 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between EAGG and IBTM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EAGG vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison
EAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than IBTM's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.96% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.24% | 2.07% | 1.09% | 1.82% | 3.17% | 0.61% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 3.87% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EAGG vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAGG drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than IBTM's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAGG and IBTM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAGG | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -13.60% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -2.85% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -1.91% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -4.95% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.01% | -0.10% |
Volatility
EAGG vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) at 1.54%. This indicates that EAGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EAGG | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 1.54% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 2.72% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 4.77% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 7.69% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.54% | 7.69% | -2.15% |